WordPress Classic Editor vs Gutenberg: Which One is Better for You?

When it comes to editing content in WordPress, users have two main options: the Classic Editor and the Gutenberg block editor. Over the years, WordPress has transitioned from a simple text-based editor to a more advanced, block-based experience. This shift has sparked ongoing discussions about usability, flexibility, and performance, leading many users to compare the WordPress Classic Editor vs Gutenberg to determine which suits their needs best.

The Classic Editor vs Gutenberg debate highlights key differences in functionality, user experience, and customization. While the Classic Editor resembles a traditional word processor, Gutenberg introduces a modular approach with blocks, making it easier to design visually rich pages. 

In this guide, we’ll explore how these editors evolved, their core differences, and which one is the better fit for different types of WordPress users.

Detailed Comparison of Classic Editor and Gutenberg

To truly understand the differences between the Classic Editor and Gutenberg, it’s important to look at their development history, core features, and how each editor handles content creation. This section breaks down those key aspects in detail to help you make an informed decision.

A. Development Background

The Classic Editor WordPress was the default content editor for years, providing a simple, TinyMCE-based experience similar to traditional word processors. However, in December 2018, WordPress introduced a new block-based editor called Gutenberg as part of WordPress 5.0.

The transition wasn’t without controversy – many users were hesitant to adopt the new editor due to workflow changes and initial instability. While some embraced Gutenberg’s flexibility, others preferred the familiarity of the Classic Editor, leading WordPress to offer it as a plugin with extended support.

B. Core Features

Both editors serve the same purpose – creating and editing content – but their approaches differ significantly:

• Editing Capabilities: The Classic Editor provides a basic text editing interface with a toolbar for formatting, similar to Microsoft Word. Gutenberg introduces blocks, allowing users to arrange content modularly with greater design control.
• Media Handling: Classic Editor relies on the traditional media uploader, whereas Gutenberg offers media blocks that simplify embedding images, videos, and galleries directly within content.
• Content Formatting Options: The Classic Editor uses shortcodes and custom HTML for advanced formatting, while Gutenberg provides pre-designed blocks for headings, lists, buttons, and more.

C. User Interface and Experience

• Design and Layout: Gutenberg’s block-based system provides a structured, drag-and-drop experience, whereas Classic Editor maintains a minimalistic, text-focused layout.
• Ease of Use: Classic Editor is straightforward, making it ideal for users accustomed to traditional word processors. Gutenberg requires a shift in mindset but offers more intuitive content structuring once mastered.
• Learning Curve: Users familiar with classic WYSIWYG (What You See Is What You Get) editors may find Classic Editor easier, whereas Gutenberg introduces a learning curve due to its block system.

D. Performance Metrics

• Loading Times: Gutenberg generally loads faster due to its optimized JavaScript-based structure, while the Classic Editor relies on older TinyMCE technology.
• Resource Consumption: The Classic Editor is lightweight but lacks modern optimizations, whereas Gutenberg, despite its added functionality, is well-optimized for performance.
• Stability: Classic Editor is highly stable, having been around for years. Gutenberg has seen improvements but initially had issues with stability and backward compatibility.

E. Compatibility Considerations

• Plugin Integration: Many older plugins were built with the Classic Editor in mind, but most major WordPress plugins have since adapted to Gutenberg.
• Theme Compatibility: Classic Editor works with virtually all themes, whereas Gutenberg requires themes optimized for block-based editing to unlock its full potential.
• Backward Compatibility: The Classic Editor ensures compatibility with older sites, while Gutenberg’s modern approach may require adjustments for legacy content.

F. Customization and Design Flexibility

• Block-Based Design vs. Traditional Editing: The biggest difference is that Gutenberg allows users to build pages with blocks, whereas Classic Editor follows a single-text-area approach.
• Template Creation: Gutenberg supports reusable blocks and full-page templates, while Classic Editor relies on theme-based templates.
• Third-Party Customization Tools: Gutenberg has spurred the development of block-based plugins and themes, whereas Classic Editor relies on traditional WordPress plugins and custom code.

G. Future Outlook and Support

• Official Support Timelines: WordPress plans to support the Classic Editor plugin until at least 2024, but Gutenberg remains the long-term default editor.
• Community Involvement: Gutenberg has a growing ecosystem, with developers actively contributing to its improvement, while Classic Editor is maintained mainly for legacy support.
• Planned Updates and Features: Gutenberg continues evolving, adding new blocks, improved performance, and full-site editing capabilities, shaping the future of WordPress content creation.

For users wondering what is Gutenberg and how it compares to the Classic Editor, the choice depends on workflow preferences and long-term goals. While Classic Editor remains a reliable option, Gutenberg’s growing ecosystem and expanding capabilities make it the future of WordPress content editing.

Pros and Cons

When comparing WordPress Classic Editor vs Gutenberg, both editors have their own advantages and limitations. Choosing the right one depends on user preferences, workflow requirements, and the level of customization needed.

A. Classic Editor

Let’s start with discussing the pros and cons of Classic Editor. 

Advantages

• Familiar and Simple: The Classic Editor provides a traditional WYSIWYG (What You See Is What You Get) experience, making it easy for users accustomed to older text-based editors.
• Lightweight and Fast: With minimal features, the Classic Editor loads quickly and consumes fewer resources, ensuring a smooth user experience.
• Broad Plugin Compatibility: Since it has been the standard for years, most plugins are fully compatible with the Classic Editor.
• No Learning Curve: Ideal for users who prefer a straightforward, distraction-free writing experience without needing to learn a new system.
• Stable and Reliable: Since it has been around for a long time, it offers stability with fewer unexpected changes or bugs.

Limitations

• Limited Formatting Options: The Classic Editor lacks the advanced content structuring capabilities that Gutenberg’s block system provides.
• Dependent on Shortcodes and HTML: To achieve advanced layouts or features, users often rely on shortcodes or custom HTML, which can be cumbersome.
• Less Future-Proof: WordPress has shifted its focus toward Gutenberg, meaning future updates and enhancements will primarily cater to the block editor.
• No Drag-and-Drop Features: Unlike Gutenberg, the Classic Editor does not allow users to visually design pages with blocks.

B. Gutenberg

Let’s now move to exploring the advantages and weaknesses of Gutenberg. 

Strengths

• Modern, Block-Based Editing: Gutenberg introduces a more flexible content creation experience with blocks for text, images, buttons, and other elements.
• Drag-and-Drop Functionality: Users can rearrange blocks easily, allowing for more visual customization without needing extra plugins or custom code.
• Improved Media Handling: Embedding media such as images, videos, and galleries is more intuitive with dedicated blocks for each content type.
• Reusable Blocks and Templates: Users can create and save content blocks for use across multiple pages, improving efficiency.
• Integration with Future WordPress Updates: As the default editor, Gutenberg will continue evolving with new features and improved compatibility.

Weaknesses

• Learning Curve: Users switching from Classic Editor may find Gutenberg’s block system unfamiliar and need time to adapt.
• Occasional Compatibility Issues: While major plugins have adapted, some older themes and plugins may not fully support Gutenberg.
• More Resource-Intensive: Gutenberg relies on JavaScript, which can slightly increase resource consumption compared to the Classic Editor.
• Frequent Updates and Changes: While improvements are ongoing, the editor is still evolving, meaning users may experience changes that affect their workflow.

In the Classic Editor vs Gutenberg debate, the right choice depends on user preferences and project needs. The Classic Editor remains a reliable, minimalistic option for those who prefer a simple writing experience, while Gutenberg offers greater flexibility, customization, and long-term viability as WordPress continues to innovate.

User Perspectives

The debate between Classic Editor WordPress and Gutenberg continues as users evaluate the benefits and drawbacks of each. Adoption rates, user feedback, and real-world case studies provide insights into how different groups perceive and utilize these editors.

A. Adoption Rates

Since its launch in 2018, Gutenberg has become the default editor for WordPress. However, many users still rely on the Classic Editor plugin.

• As of 2024, the Classic Editor WordPress plugin remains widely used, with over 5 million active installations. Many businesses, agencies, and developers prefer its familiarity and stability.
• WordPress adoption reports indicate that Gutenberg usage has steadily increased, particularly among new WordPress users and those building visually rich websites.
• Major WordPress themes and plugins have adapted to Gutenberg, making it a more viable long-term option.

B. User Testimonials

User feedback varies based on experience level, workflow, and project requirements.

• Developers’ Perspective: Many developers appreciate Gutenberg’s block-based structure for its flexibility and compatibility with modern web development practices. However, some express concerns about performance and backward compatibility.
• Content Creators’ Perspective: Writers and bloggers accustomed to traditional word processors often prefer the Classic Editor for its simplicity. Others, however, find “What is Gutenberg” appealing due to its ability to create visually engaging content without additional plugins.
• Agencies’ Perspective: Agencies working with multiple clients have mixed opinions – some prefer the ease of Gutenberg for layout creation, while others stick to the Classic Editor for consistency across older sites.

The choice between Classic Editor WordPress and Gutenberg largely depends on individual preferences, workflow needs, and long-term goals. While the Classic Editor continues to serve users who favor simplicity, Gutenberg’s growing adoption and enhanced capabilities make it the future of WordPress content editing.

Making the Choice: Which Editor Suits Your Needs?

When deciding between WordPress Classic Editor vs Gutenberg, users should evaluate their specific needs, workflow, and long-term goals. While both editors serve the purpose of content creation, their approaches are significantly different, making the choice highly dependent on individual use cases.

A. Factors to Consider

1. Project Requirements
   
   • If your project demands a simple, text-focused writing experience with minimal design needs, the Classic Editor may be the better fit.
   • If you require more advanced layouts, reusable content blocks, and a visually rich design, Gutenberg is the preferred choice.
2. Team Expertise
   
   • Teams familiar with traditional word processors or TinyMCE editors may find the Classic Editor easier to use with minimal training.
   • Developers, designers, and marketers who want more design control without third-party page builders may benefit from Gutenberg’s block-based editing.
3. Long-Term Maintenance
   
   • WordPress has made Gutenberg the default editor, meaning future updates and improvements will primarily support block editing.
   • While the Classic Editor plugin remains available, its support is expected to phase out over time, potentially causing compatibility issues with newer themes and plugins.

B. Recommendations

Below you will find some practical suggestions on when to use each of the models. 

Scenarios Favoring Classic Editor

• Writers and bloggers who prefer a straightforward, distraction-free writing interface.
• Businesses managing legacy websites built before Gutenberg’s introduction, ensuring compatibility without reworking existing content.
• Developers working with older themes and plugins that may not be fully optimized for the block editor.
• Organizations requiring stability and minimal updates, avoiding potential workflow disruptions from frequent Gutenberg changes.

Scenarios Favoring Gutenberg

• Content creators and marketers who need visually appealing, structured layouts without coding.
• Website owners who want modern, future-proof solutions that align with WordPress’s long-term development strategy.
• Agencies and developers working on new projects, leveraging Gutenberg’s flexibility, performance improvements, and block-based customization.
• Users looking for drag-and-drop design capabilities without relying on additional page builders.

In the Classic Editor vs Gutenberg debate, both editors have their place in the WordPress ecosystem. The Classic Editor remains a viable option for those who prioritize simplicity and stability, while Gutenberg offers enhanced design flexibility and long-term viability. Ultimately, the best choice depends on your project’s needs, team expertise, and future goals.

Transitioning from Classic Editor to Gutenberg

For users still relying on Classic Editor WordPress, transitioning to Gutenberg can seem daunting. However, with careful planning, the process can be smooth and beneficial in the long run. This section outlines the key steps for a successful migration, from preparation to implementation and troubleshooting.

A. Preparation Steps

Before making the switch, it’s essential to assess your current website setup and plan accordingly.

1. Content Audit
   
   • Review existing pages and posts to identify any formatting or shortcode dependencies that might break in Gutenberg.
   • Check if any custom post types or plugins rely on the Classic Editor and may need alternative solutions.
2. Backup Strategies
   
   • Always create a full site backup before transitioning. This includes content, themes, plugins, and the database.
   • Use plugins like UpdraftPlus or Jetpack Backup to ensure you can revert if needed.

B. Implementation Process

Switching to what is Gutenberg can be done in phases to minimize disruptions.

1. Training Resources
   
   • Familiarize yourself with Gutenberg’s features using WordPress’s official documentation and tutorials.
   • Encourage team members to practice using Gutenberg in a staging environment before implementing it on a live site.
2. Gradual Rollout Plans
   
   • Instead of switching everything at once, start with non-critical pages or blog posts.
   • Use the Classic Editor plugin alongside Gutenberg during the transition, allowing team members to adjust at their own pace.
   • If needed, activate the “Classic Block” within Gutenberg, which enables users to continue editing in a familiar interface while slowly adopting blocks.

C. Addressing Challenges

Even with careful planning, some challenges may arise when migrating from Classic Editor WordPress to Gutenberg.

1. Common Issues and Solutions
   
   • Formatting Disruptions: Some older content may not display correctly in Gutenberg. Solution: Use the “Classic Block” to maintain original formatting and gradually update content to blocks.
   • Plugin and Theme Compatibility: Some themes and plugins built for the Classic Editor may not work optimally with Gutenberg. Solution: Check for updates or replace outdated plugins with Gutenberg-friendly alternatives.
   • User Resistance: Team members accustomed to the Classic Editor may struggle with the change. Solution: Provide hands-on training and highlight Gutenberg’s benefits, such as drag-and-drop customization and reusable content blocks.
2. Community Support Channels
   
   • WordPress Forums: The official WordPress support forums offer guidance and troubleshooting help from experienced users.
   • Developer Documentation: WordPress.org provides detailed documentation on using and extending Gutenberg’s capabilities.
   • Gutenberg-Focused Plugins and Resources: Many plugin developers and WordPress communities offer additional resources to help users maximize their experience with the block editor.

Migration from Classic Editor WordPress to what is Gutenberg requires careful preparation, phased implementation, and ongoing support. While the process may come with challenges, the long-term benefits of improved customization, performance, and WordPress compatibility make the switch worthwhile.

Classic Editor vs Gutenberg: Which One Wins?

The debate between WordPress Classic Editor vs Gutenberg comes down to user preference and long-term viability. The Classic Editor provides a familiar, straightforward experience that many writers and bloggers still prefer. It’s stable, lightweight, and ideal for those who don’t need advanced design features. However, Gutenberg offers a modern, block-based approach that enhances customization, making it easier to create visually dynamic content without relying on extra plugins or coding.

As WordPress continues to evolve, the focus remains on expanding Gutenberg’s capabilities. Full-site editing, improved performance, and growing plugin compatibility make it clear that WordPress is fully invested in the block editor. While the Classic Editor remains an option, its long-term support is uncertain. Businesses and agencies that adapt to Gutenberg now will be better positioned for the future of WordPress development.

For those transitioning from Classic Editor WordPress, adopting Gutenberg can feel overwhelming. Many users struggle with the learning curve, plugin compatibility, and workflow adjustments. That’s where White Label Agency (WLA) comes in. Our team of WordPress experts specializes in seamless migrations, custom theme development, and site optimization to ensure a smooth transition without disrupting your business operations. 

Whether you need help adapting your content strategy, training your team, or building a fully customized Gutenberg-powered website, we provide the expertise to make the switch effortless. Contact us today to discuss how we can help streamline your content management and enhance your website’s performance.